Giving up densities of rabbits Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

big up densities of rabbits - Research Paper ExampleThe purpose of the study was to determine how far the cottontail would go from its natural habitat for the provender fit(p) up in the trays. The prediction was that the cottontail rabbits would not jeopardize too far from their home for the solid food set up in the trays at a advertize distance. There were two trays set up at a closer distance. In the one tray the food was easier for the rabbits to lower to than in the other tray that was set out at a close distance to the propinquity of the rabbits natural habitat. The prediction was that the rabbits would not unavoidableness to venture to far away from the habitat to find the food that was set out for them. The rabbits would not work as hard at the closer two trays that were set up with the rabbit nibble, because the rabbits would be too frightened that a predator would come and hunt the rabbit. The rabbits would squander the food from the tray that was easier to grab at, and easier to get to the food, because the rabbits would not want to stand there too long to get the food. The rabbits would want to hurry, and eat so they would not be discoered by any predators. The importance of a rabbit giving up density is because the rabbits do not want to be discovered magical spell going through extra lengths just to get the food. The rabbits give up density for safety, and will of all time go for the easier food that is closer to their habitat, than go for food that is far away from their habitat. When we say habitat we be referring to a location that suits best the basic needs of the living organism, Cottontail Rabbit Habitat, (1). Materials and Methods The materials used for this try out were four feeding troughs. The troughs were fill with dry sand, and then filled with rabbit chow. The rabbit chow was merge with the sand. There was the same tote up of food disgorge into two troughs, and the same amount of food put into the other two troughs. The t roughs were filled with unequal portions of sand. When the sand was poured into the troughs with the food the food was then blended strong with the sand. The two troughs with the most food in them were placed further in the field. The two troughs with the least amount of food were left near the habitat of the rabbits. When the rabbits came out in the night the rabbits ate from the two troughs that were close at hand(predicate) to the habitat. Cottontail rabbits generally forage for food at night and stay concealed in drag during the daytime, Moore, (1). The researchers put the troughs out at night, and expected the rabbits to eat from them during the night. The experiment was conducted in the same spot over the course of the triad nights. The experiment warranted the use of the troughs in the same spots over the course of the three nights as not to have inconsistencies with the results of the experiment. The rabbits ate more food from the trough that was closest to their habita t, and not filled with as oftentimes sand. The researchers found that the rabbits ate more from the trough that did not have as much sand in it, because the rabbits found it easier to get to the food with less sand in the trough. The rabbits did not want to linger too long at the troughs to get the food. The rabbits were afraid of any predator coming near and harming the rabbits as the rabbits were trying to eat. Results The results of the experiment were that the rabbits ate less out of the two troughs that were far away. The rabbits ate more out of the trough that was close to their habitat,